Skip to content

Future Growth on Lake Kilby Rd?

Last October a developer requested to rezone a parcel of land right on Lake Kilby Road (RZN2021-00018). The developer wished to rezone the land from agricultural to medium density residential and build a housing development of 225 homes on 106 acres of farmland.  

The development in the request would be built just south of a development called Pitchkettle Farms. Pitchkettle Farms is zoned low residential density and has 112 houses, some with half-acre lots. To secure the support of the Pitchkettle Farms HOA, the developer agreed to ask for a variance, which was another item on the October Planning Commission agenda. 

Good city planning practices require an interconnectivity of streets. So new neighborhoods built next to established neighborhoods connect by way of connection stubs. When Pitchkettle Farms was approved, it included the required connection point to join any future development. 

The developer requested this a variance to normal city planning requirements because the Pitchkettle Farm neighborhood was, understandably so, not excited to be connecting to a new development with twice the number of homes, all of whom could be using their main street, Pitchkettle Farm Lane, to access Pitchkettle Road. Who wants to add that much traffic to their small neighborhood street?

However, there are many good reasons to make sure in city planning that roads connect. It reduces traffic congestion, provides continuous and more direct routes, increases safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, improves EMS vehicle access and response times, improves quality of utility connections and increases efficiency for public services like school buses and trash collection. For all of these reasons, the variance request was denied, and rightfully so.

Above is the original plan for the proposed development. Each yellow box represents a lot. At the top of the graphic, there is a row of lots, and in the middle of that row, there is a yellow line separating two housing lots. That line is where the neighborhoods should be connected by city standards. 

The variance was requested to appease the Pitchkettle Farm HOA and gain their support for the new development. When the variance was denied, the HOA President no longer supported the new development. The developer has a long history of looking for support from HOA boards from neighboring developments. To get their support this time, he has redesigned the development so that the neighborhood barely connects (just a small little corner!) Thus he is hoping to avoid the issue altogether.

Above is the new plan. You can see a wedge piece of land removed from the top portion, so that it now has only the slightest connection with Pitchkettle Farms (north of proposed development), presumably to connect in with their public utilities, but avoid the road connectivity that the city requires.

The new development would be 204 houses on 87 acres of farmland.

When I sit here looking at the new plan, two questions spring to mind. The first is, what is the developer’s plan with that wedge slice of land? I notice the houses don’t follow the road all the way to the exit. Could it be that he plans to continue that road in the future? If so, he will likely be required by the city to connect the wedge piece to both developments, and there is plenty of room for a road to make that connection and to throw a couple dozen more houses there as well. 

My second question is what happened to the road from the first plan in the northeast portion. That road was designed to connect to the commerce park area (already rezoned!) but there is a cul-de-sac in the new plan. Will that stay a cul-de-sac or will that connect to the commerce park? In case you are curious, areas zoned commerce park in Suffolk, by right, can contain: offices, office warehouses, or research and development facilities.

Above is a rendering of what could be in-store soon for those on Lake Kilby Rd. Lake Kilby Rd is a narrow country road, with flooding issues and large trucks that are unable to safely pass other traffic (see here and here.) In addition, both Elephant’s Fork Elementary and King’s Fork High School (the schools for this new development) are already overcrowded, without the added 204 houses this would bring. 

Is this what we want to see for the future of Suffolk? Hundreds of houses pack on small parcels of land, with inadequate public services to provide for the citizens? If we do nothing, this is likely what we will see just down the road. If you want to stop this, join with CARE4Suffolk and help us let the city know we do not want this.

 

Important Information

Planning Commission Meeting, Tuesday, March 21 at 2pm at City Hall is at 442 W. Washington St. 

Sign our petition to let the city know what you think.

Email the City Planning Department direct – planningemail@suffolkva.us

Email City Council direct – council@suffolkva.us

Call City Planning – 757-514-4060

Follow us at CARE4Suffolk.org

To receive email updates, please complete this form.

5 thoughts on “Future Growth on Lake Kilby Rd?”

  1. I do not agree to this development(s). The roads cannot handle the traffic. If they approve this, then I’m sure they will take road frontage from the Lake Kilby Road home owners to widen the road.

  2. I live on lake Kilby road and traffic is already so bad I feel like I am in danger of getting hit buy vehicles just to get my mail, there is no regards to speed limit and no truck signs. How much of my property will be taken to improve the road for the extra 2000 vehicles a day, plus traffic to the new commerce park which would include TRUCKS.
    I do not agree to this development(s). Please leave the property zoned as done by the city (1 home per 3 acres). There needs to be a limit on the overcrowding of schools and roads, this development (s) will only make matters MUCH worse!

  3. We do not need over 200 more homes on Lake Kilby road. The traffic is already bad, the roads are to narrow, you will take other people’s property to fix them. What is wrong with the city council? Money hungry! You do not ask what the people want and you do not care about the schools needs
    Leave us with our farm land!! I am sure none of these officials will be willing to live in these congested areas

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.