agriculture – Care4Suffolk https://care4suffolk.org Wed, 02 Oct 2024 16:38:08 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://care4suffolk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cropped-Care4Suffolk-32x32.png agriculture – Care4Suffolk https://care4suffolk.org 32 32 Comparison of Suffolk’s Comp Plans https://care4suffolk.org/2024/10/02/comparison-of-suffolks-comp-plans/ https://care4suffolk.org/2024/10/02/comparison-of-suffolks-comp-plans/#respond Wed, 02 Oct 2024 16:35:09 +0000 https://care4suffolk.org/?p=5440 Read More »Comparison of Suffolk’s Comp Plans]]>

Suffolk’s 2018 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1998 and was the first of three comprehensive plans adopted by the City. Currently, the City is working on the fourth iteration which is scheduled to be voted on by City Council on November 20th, after the election but just before Thanksgiving.

Care4Suffolk recently obtained a copy of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan. It is not available online, but we had a member go in and take photos of each of the roughly 700 pages of the document and accompanying appendices. We are hoping to provide the public with a copy online in the future.

With the new comp plan still under way, I thought this was a good opportunity to share some of the aspects of the first comprehensive plan, especially in light of the recent admission by a city leader that this new plan is about Suffolk’s role in supporting the Port of Virginia. 

The 2018 Comprehensive Plan emphasized balanced growth, specifically about keeping the growth healthy and sustainable. There were no ‘market trends’ which seems to be a focus in the 2045 Comp Plan. The second major focus of the 2018 plan was an environmental theme with a lot of focus on protecting ground water, reservoirs, and rivers. 

Another theme in the old plan is preserving rural character, including a focus on rural, agricultural land, and open space. This was an actual focus, not just lip service like it is in the 2045 Comp Plan, which does mention these ideals, but it is a low priority and is juxtaposed to the massive land use changes that contradict protecting rural areas.

Core revitalizing in downtown Suffolk with economic development made up the last major theme. Economic development included agriculture and tourism along with manufacturing, office, and commercial development. This is a huge contrast to the 2045 Comp Plan which focuses heavily on creating more warehousing space to serve the Port of Virginia.

The part that stood out most about the 2018 Comp Plan was the part where is stated:

“These key ideas are a result of an intensive two-year planning process. They reflect ideas from many citizens who attended and participated in many meetings and responded on public comment forms.”

What a contrast to the 2045 Comp Plan which did a great job getting public input, but focused on the ideas of the ‘other stakeholders’ (Port of Virginia and developers) over the vision of the citizens.

Another contrast between the original comp plan and the prosed 2045 plan – the original was based on a wealth of data. The 2018 Comp Plan contained a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA). Current city leaders are unconcerned with the fact that staff decided AGAINST doing the FIA, a frustration with citizens who are looking for fiscal responsibility from city leaders.

These pages are from Chapter 1of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan.

The 2018 Comp Plan also had a substantial amount of data on agriculture in Suffolk. One map included in the plan showed the soil conditions throughout the city. 

This image is from the 2018 Comp Plan and shows the soil map – conditions of the soil throughout the city. The original map is completely in black and white. The green highlighted was done by Care4Suffolk to delineate the good soil land.

The green highlighted area represent good soil – suitable for farming. Compare the good soil map with the proposed growth areas in the 2045 Comp Plan highlighted in red. Please note that a lot of the red is actually from the current growth area under the 2035 comp plan, but the 2045 additional growth areas have been added as well to represent what will be the Growth Area if the 2045 Comp Plan is passed.

The growth areas will not stop there, however. The 2045 Comprehensive Plan contains language that allows for both utility solar and industrial projects that the City deems desirable, on agricultural lands outside the growth area. Additionally, in five years, the City will evaluate the comp plan again and can add additional growth areas if they chose. The City’s original growth area expansion in the February 2024 draft was even more extensive, but they pulled back on some of those areas due to public outcry.

The map below includes all the areas from the February draft and is telling of the City’s thinking about future growth. Each successive draft gobbles up more and more of that good soil area, chipping away at the agricultural industry in Suffolk. 

How well the 2018 Comprehensive Plan was implemented, I can’t say. The2018 plan states itself: 

“In some communities, the Comprehensive Plan is all but invisible, used for little else than as a reference point for contentious rezonings. It is often no more than the servant of the marketplace, simply ratifying the status quo. In other places, it is a rallying point for citizens and leaders who say, ‘this is the way we want our community to look!'”

I don’t want a comprehensive plan that’s sole purpose is to serve the needs of other stake-holders. I want a comprehensive plan that is of the people, for the people, by the people. The people have told the City what they want for Suffolk’s future – it is time for the City to start listening to us.

]]>
https://care4suffolk.org/2024/10/02/comparison-of-suffolks-comp-plans/feed/ 0
City’s Vision Lacking: Suffolk to Support Regional Goals https://care4suffolk.org/2024/05/06/citys-vision-lacking-suffolk-to-support-regional-goals/ https://care4suffolk.org/2024/05/06/citys-vision-lacking-suffolk-to-support-regional-goals/#respond Mon, 06 May 2024 19:44:56 +0000 https://care4suffolk.org/?p=4479 Read More »City’s Vision Lacking: Suffolk to Support Regional Goals]]>

At the Joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting on May 1, 2024, city leaders highlighted their extraordinary efforts to reach out to the community during the development of the 2045 Comprehensive Plan. They were right! They did get a lot of engagement and input from the public and we applaud them for that. Unfortunately, the City didn’t listen to us. This new comprehensive plan is NOT reflective of the comments from the citizens of Suffolk.  

We said that we want to maintain our small town feel, preserve our open space, focus on creating a vibrant and flourishing downtown, have affordable housing, and respect our agricultural history. The public feedback overwhelmingly told the City that we are growing too fast and our infrastructure can’t keep up. The citizens want to maintain what makes us special: a city with a small town feel and strong agricultural roots. 

In contrast, City Staff chose to focus this new comprehensive plan on Regionalism and Suffolk’s role in the economic engine that is the Port of Virginia. The City’s vision for Suffolk’s future is one of warehouses, congested roads, and suburban sprawl. 

Why do the citizens of Suffolk have to sacrifice our wide-open spaces, prime farmland, and our small-town feel, to make room for more warehouses, more truck traffic, and more suburban sprawl? 

Instead of taking this public feedback and creating a vision the people can support, the City disregarded our desires in order to follow ‘recent trends’ and capitalize on the Port of Virginia. As citizens of Suffolk, we deserve better! We deserve a comprehensive plan that is focused on OUR priorities, encompassing the values we have and  not just paying lip-service to them. 

What if, instead of focusing on being one of the fastest growing cities in Virginia, we focus on being the city everyone wants to visit? What if we take the special qualities we already have and make them more visible and interconnected? An alternative vision for Suffolk is one where nature, agriculture and a vibrant and thriving downtown come together. We can achieve this if we discard that vision of warehouse and suburban sprawl and instead look inwards on how we can improve the Suffolk we have. 

Tourism in Suffolk had an economic impact of $217.8 million in 2022. Compare that to neighboring Chesapeake, with almost $800 million dollars of impact; it is clear there is significant room for growth in the tourism industry here. (source) Even more impressively, the greater Richmond area brought in $3.5 billion in direct tourist spending in 2022 ,with Henrico County alone accounting for $1.7 billion dollars of that tourist money. (source) Richmond and its surrounding areas focus on youth sports. Suffolk should have its own focus and is well-poised to capitalize on its small-town charm, agricultural community and its ecological and outdoor adventure possibilities.

Suffolk already has so much to offer with its unique character, history, and culture. It is rich in natural resources with a mild climate that  allows for year-round outdoor activity.  Our villages  each have their own charm and there are abundant historical sites throughout the City. A more focused emphasis on connecting our parks, waterways, bike paths, historical sites, cultural attractions, and small businesses would enhance the community both for residents and visitors. 

Agriculture is the single largest private industry in the state, generating roughly $462 million of direct and indirect economic impact for the City of Suffolk. (source) It can be the key to Suffolk’s future if we let it. “Agritourism” is a growing subset of tourism. People are looking for that authentic experience and the opportunity to connect with nature and the rural environment. One way we could invest in our agricultural community is with the construction of an agricultural complex that could serve as a venue to draw visitors and farmers from around the state and beyond. It could host everything from horse shows to dog shows, livestock events, chicken swaps, tractor pulls, and educational opportunities with organizations like  4-H and Future Farmers of America. 

Our local agricultural community could be the backbone of a new public market that could be located downtown. Public markets can be a driving economic force in communities, as well as a public space for increasing social integration and providing opportunities for social mobility. (source) They provide access to the marketplace for small local businesses, serve as a supply of fresh produce in food deserts, offer a venue for local artists and musicians, and have the ability to draw people from throughout the city and surrounding areas as a tourist destination. A public market could  link the rural areas of Suffolk to our downtown, revitalizing it with new economic opportunities and  bringing people together.  

A passenger rail stop downtown could generate even more tourism. Amtrak reported record ridership to Newport News, Norfolk, and Richmond with over 92,610 riders in March 2024, up 24% from the previous March. (source) According to Michigan State University, tourism has become one of the largest and fastest-growing economic sectors and can be a “key economic driver of socio-economic progress through the creation of jobs, new business, export revenues and infrastructure development.” (source

Instead of building suburban sprawl outside the downtown area that will incur more heavy long-term infrastructure costs, we can focus on infill towards our city center. A thousand more tightly-packed single-family homes built on farmland and priced at $400,000 will not help with the affordable housing crisis in our city. We don’t have to build houses for everyone to move to Suffolk–instead, let’s make it a priority to build affordable housing for our citizens already living in Suffolk. 

Warehouses may bring some economic benefit to a city, but it is accompanied by heavy truck traffic, air and noise pollution. They are unsightly and do not instill public pride or contribute to the social and cultural experiences of a city.  By contrast, agriculture, tourism and a public market can enhance a community on many levels, contributing to economic development while preserving natural resources. These things can become a source of pride for our city. 

A commitment to stop paving over our farmland could bring about a future for Suffolk that ties us together. Things like a passenger rail stop, a public market, and an agricultural complex, along with increased interconnectivity of our parks, trails, waterways, historic sites and villages, could provide us a thriving downtown and preserve our agricultural lands for generations to come. 

This vision is in line with the public feedback the City received – serving as the warehouse capital of Virginia is not. Let’s focus on what makes Suffolk special. Let’s say no to the vision in the 2045 Comprehensive Plan and ask the City to envision a better future for Suffolk. 

This is just one alternative vision for Suffolk. It’s not perfect, but I think it is a great improvement over warehouses and suburban sprawl. What are your ideas and thoughts about what we can do to create a better future for our city? Please comment below or email us at care4suffolk@gmail.com to share your ideas. 

How do the competing visions of Agriculture & Tourism v. Warehouses
compare with Public Input? See for yourself in the charts below:

Please sign our petition to urge City Council to vote ‘NO’ to the new 2045 Comprehensive Plan. 

]]>
https://care4suffolk.org/2024/05/06/citys-vision-lacking-suffolk-to-support-regional-goals/feed/ 0
The Loss of Farmlands: A Loss for All of Us https://care4suffolk.org/2024/02/21/the-loss-of-farmlands-a-loss-for-all-of-us/ https://care4suffolk.org/2024/02/21/the-loss-of-farmlands-a-loss-for-all-of-us/#comments Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:59:04 +0000 https://care4suffolk.org/?p=3412 Read More »The Loss of Farmlands: A Loss for All of Us]]>

We recently wrote about the City of Suffolk’s plan to increase its Growth Area by 24%. Now we want to explain why this is a short-sighted plan on the part of City Planners and why it is critical for our community to stop what will be a massive hit to our agricultural community and have negative impacts on our citizens for generations to come.

The City of Suffolk is 429 square miles, but 72 square miles of that is the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (Source: City of Suffolk). While the refuge is an ecological and historical treasure for our state and the nation, none of the 72 square miles can be developed. That leaves 357 square miles of already developed and potentially developable land in the City of Suffolk. The current growth area is 74.5 square miles (about 21% of the non-swamp land in Suffolk). The Planning Department is recommending expanding the growth area by 18 square miles (a 24% increase to its current size) which would bring it to 92.5 square miles. That will create a total growth area that is equal to 26% of all non-swamp land in Suffolk.

Only 17% of all land in America is ideal for farming. (Source: Modern Farmer) As a country we have lost 11 million acres of farmland and ranchland between 2001-2016 due to development. (Source: American Farmland Trust) Further, 62% of all development has happened on agricultural land. (Source: Modern Farmer) As the world population grows, the natural resource of farmable land becomes increasingly valuable. The world’s population is expected to increase by 35% by 2050 and “nearly all new food production in the next 25 years will have to come from existing agricultural land.” (Source: National Geographic Magazine)

Those are just some quick facts to show that this problem is not localized to just Suffolk, which has lost 17% of its farmland in the last 20 years. (Source: Suffolk Agricultural Advisory Committee) This is a problem throughout the country. According to the 2022 Census of Agriculture, the number of farms in Virginia decreased from 43,225 in 2017 to 38,995 farms in 2022, losing about 500,000 acres of farmland. (Source: 2022 Census of Agriculture (Reported by On the Farm Radio)) That’s a 6.4% in just 5 years. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, in response to the 2022 Census of Agriculture stated, “This survey is a wake up call…Are we okay with losing that many farms? Are we okay with losing that much farmland? Or is there a better way.” (Source: AgWire)

“This survey is a wake up call…Are we okay with losing that many farms? Are we okay with losing that much farmland? Or is there a better way.”

Here is why you should care about this loss of farmland:


Farmland keeps property taxes lower. In Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, they broke down the impact of the cost of services for agriculture, residential and commercial properties. For each $1 collected in property taxes for each type of land, the city has an associated cost of services. The results may surprise you.
(Source: Lehigh County, Pennsylvania)

 

$1 of agricultural tax revenue = $0.36 spent in public service

$1 of commercial tax revenue = $0.99 spent in public service

$1 of residential tax revenue = $1.30 spent in public services

 

Turning farmland into commercial and residential land actually costs the city (or the taxpayers) more money. Cities lose money on residential properties because they require schools, improved roads, and other additional services such as water, sewers, police, fire, and medical. The city actually makes significantly more money on agricultural land than it pays in services. If citizens (and responsible city planners) want to save money, they should stop rezoning agricultural land to build houses and warehouses.

 

Other benefits of preserving our farmland (Source: Lehigh County, Pennsylvania)

  • It provides locally grown foods that are more nutritious and less expensive than food that has to be transported over long distances.

  • It improves water quality by filtering runoff water through topsoil versus going directly from paved surfaces into drainage. This is particularly important in Suffolk, home to many of the reservoirs that provide drinking water for so many people in Hampton Roads.

  • It benefits the environment by protecting against soil erosion, offsets greenhouse gas emissions, and provides habitat to many wildlife species.

  • Open farmland is more visually attractive and creates a higher quality of life for citizens.

  • Additionally, Agriculture is big business. Agriculture generates roughly $462 million of direct and indirect economic impact for Suffolk. (Source: Suffolk Agricultural Advisory Committee

 

 

It is nearsighted planning that will destroy the valuable natural resource of Suffolk’s nutrient-rich farmland to build houses and warehouses. The huge expansion of the Growth Area in the upcoming Comprehensive Plan will facilitate this loss of farmland. Its destruction will be permanent and will be a loss to our city, our community, and future generations.

 

 

Let City Council know what you think about this new growth area: council@suffolkva.us 

Michael D. Duman, Mayor

mayor@suffolkva.us

Phone: 757-514-4009


Lue R. Ward, Jr., Vice Mayor

(Nansemond Borough)

nansemond@suffolkva.us

Phone: 757-377-6929


Shelley Butler Barlow,

Council Member

(Chuckatuck Borough)

chuckatuck@suffolkva.us

Phone: 757-346-8355

 

Leroy Bennett, Council Member
(Cypress Borough)
cypress@suffolkva.us
Phone: 757-407-3750

Timothy J. Johnson, Council Member
(Holy Neck Borough)
holyneck@suffolkva.us
Phone: 757-407-0556

 

Roger W. Fawcett, Council Member
(Sleepy Hole Borough)
sleepyhole@suffolkva.us
Phone: 757-377-8641

John Rector, Council Member
(Suffolk Borough)
suffolk@suffolkva.us
Phone: 757-407-1953
 

LeOtis Williams, Council Member

(Whaleyville Borough)

whaleyville@suffolkva.us

Phone: 757-402-7100

 
]]>
https://care4suffolk.org/2024/02/21/the-loss-of-farmlands-a-loss-for-all-of-us/feed/ 1
Port or People: What is the City’s Focus? https://care4suffolk.org/2024/02/06/port_or_people_what_is_the_citys__focus/ https://care4suffolk.org/2024/02/06/port_or_people_what_is_the_citys__focus/#comments Tue, 06 Feb 2024 01:11:05 +0000 https://care4suffolk.org/?p=3237 Read More »Port or People: What is the City’s Focus?]]>

The Comprehensive Plan provides the framework that guides the development of the City of Suffolk for the next several years. Over the last year, the city has been actively seeking community input to help guide what this new plan will look like. 

Community Engagement sessions and Open Houses were held throughout the city and during these, the collective voice of the citizens was clear: people were frustrated with traffic and didn’t want any more warehouses. Time after time, the residents from all areas of Suffolk expressed concern that their quality of life was being negatively impacted by warehouses and the heavy truck traffic that comes with them. 

 

Above is a photo from the June 15, 2023 Open House that Suffolk hosted to interact with the public about the proposed plans and obtain feedback. In this snapshot, you can see that the green dot stickers (given to the public to express their opinion) are placed on the ‘thumbs down’ side to show their disapproval of more warehouses in Suffolk.

Fast forward to the January 17, 2024 City Council Work Session: Suffolk’s 2045 Comprehensive Plan Lead Planner, Keith Cannady, gave a presentation about the new Comprehensive Plan draft that included Planning Staff’s recommendations for Growth Area expansion. He touted the opportunities that the Port of Virginia provides. He stated that the Port of Virginia is “changing the dynamic for the state and the region in terms of economic development opportunities” and that this is a “major driver of what’s happening here in Hampton Roads.” He claimed that Suffolk is considering “opportunities that the Port provides as we consider Growth Area boundaries.” 

Below are some of the Growth Area slides presented at this City Council Work Session. The corresponding written descriptions reflect what was explained verbally by Mr. Cannady while discussing the slide. 

(We apologize for the poor quality; these were screenshot captures from the online work session which were not high resolution to begin with.)

Northern Growth Area Option Slide

The current growth area is within the dark blue border. The only option (Option A) presented for Northern Growth Area expansion is the area within the greenish border. This is the Nansemond Parkway area and would connect the Northern and Central Growth Areas. According to Planning it is “logical” to combine the two and use the railroad as the boundary. 

(There is an “Opportunity Area” along I664 that will be discussed at City Council on Feb 7th.)

Central Growth Area Options Slide

There are 5 options being considered for expansion of the Central Growth Area. The current Central Growth Area is within the dark purple borders.

Option B: within the yellow border; expands the current growth area all the way to the city/county line along Rt. 460. The other boundaries would be the Western Branch Reservoir and “a wetland area that forms a logical boundary” to the south.

Option C: within the blue border; expands from the yellow border south to the railroad line and includes the Lake Cohoon area.

Option D: within the green border; expands west on 58 from the Centerpoint & Westport Commerce Parks down to Chapel Road.

Option E: within the red border; extends down 58 to Buckhorn Road.

Option F: within the orange border; extends north up Rt. 10/32, including Sack Point Road and up to Kingsdale Road. 

Recommendation Slide:
The Planning Department is recommending that Suffolk incorporate Options A, B, D, and F into the 2045 Comprehensive Plan.

Breakdown of Future Land Use within Growth and Opportunity Areas:

Future Land Use Slide
The City is considering changing/adding new land use categories, listed in the map key on the left side and signified by the solid-colored rectangle. Currently, there are only six or seven land use categories.

Central Growth Area Future Land Use Slide
Within the borders of Option A (within the lighter green border at the top right), Planning is recommending land use categories for residential development.
For the Central Growth Area, Planning is recommending these land use categories:
Option B: residential development to the north of Rt. 460 and “employment center” to the south all the way to the city/county line.
Option D: “employment center” to the north of Rt. 58 and residential to the south up to Chapel Road.
Option F: residential on both sides of Rt. 10/32 all the way to Kingsdale Road.

While making it clear that Suffolk is prioritizing the Port of Virginia, Mr. Cannady provided only vague comments as to the opportunities that justify expanding the Growth Areas to such a great extent. Some of his reasonings were:

  • Rt. 460 and 58 corridors offer “what we believe are significant economic development opportunities in that area.”
  • Coming south (of Rt. 460) “to a wetland area that forms a logical boundary for that corridor and would allow us to capitalize on some of the options that are out there.”
  • Option D “looks to take advantage of some of the opportunities going west out of Rt. 58.”

The recommended Growth Area expansion will total almost 17 sq mi, increasing the current Growth Area (from the 2035 Comprehensive Plan) from about 74.5 sq mi to a total of about 91.5 sq mi. That is an increase of about 23%. That is a lot of growth!

While we expect a certain amount of Growth Area expansion, it hasn’t been made clear how enlarging them to such a great extent specifically benefits the City of Suffolk and its citizens. How much economic benefit will Suffolk see with port expansion growth? This question is not answered.

Adding huge swathes of land (light purple on the Future Land Use map) designated as Employment Centers (warehouses), doesn’t happen in a vacuum. We all want Suffolk to have a vibrant economy, but all those warehouses come at a cost to citizens. They bring truck traffic, higher road maintenance costs, and pollution, as well as destroy forever fertile soil that makes up our agricultural economy, which is itself an economic powerhouse generating $462 million of direct and indirect economic impact for the City of Suffolk. In no uncertain terms, development of warehouses is to the detriment of agriculture in Suffolk. This may be what the Port of Virginia wants, and what the Planning Commission wants, but is it what the people of Suffolk want?

These recommendations go counter to public feedback during the Community Engagement Sessions and Open Houses. Was the city genuine in its efforts to include its citizens in this process? From this presentation, it doesn’t seem like it.

]]>
https://care4suffolk.org/2024/02/06/port_or_people_what_is_the_citys__focus/feed/ 1
The State of Agriculture in Suffolk https://care4suffolk.org/2024/01/26/the-state-of-agriculture-in-suffolk/ https://care4suffolk.org/2024/01/26/the-state-of-agriculture-in-suffolk/#respond Fri, 26 Jan 2024 20:57:30 +0000 https://care4suffolk.org/?p=3137 Read More »The State of Agriculture in Suffolk]]>

The Agricultural Advisory Committee Chair, David Bosselman, spoke before the City Council at the Work Session on December 20, 2023 [Link to video], presenting the State of Agriculture in Suffolk. The Agricultural Advisory Committee consists of nine members from the agricultural community in Suffolk who are nominated by City Council members. The committee is all  volunteers who give their time to provide feedback and input to the city regarding agricultural issues. 

The City of Suffolk does not track its own statistics related to agriculture, but the Agricultural Advisory Committee was able to obtain data from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS). Even Governor Younkin has recently made note of the following facts:

  • Virginia Agriculture creates more than $100 billion of annual economic impact
  • Virginia Agriculture employs about 500,000 people
  • 97% Virginia farms are family-owned
  • Agriculture is Virginia’s #1 private industry
  • There are 7.7 million acres of cropland in Virginia
  • An acre of agricultural land in Virginia generates an average of $11,000 of economic impact annually

There are nearly 47,000 acres of Suffolk cropland. Based on the figures from the state, that generates roughly $462 million of direct and indirect economic impact for the City of Suffolk. It is clear that agriculture plays a major role in Suffolk’s economy. 

According to Mr. Bosselman, the City of Suffolk does not have an Agricultural Department, despite it being specifically mentioned in the 1974 City Charter. It is unclear why this department was never created considering agriculture is such a huge part of Suffolk’s industry. Chesapeake and Virginia Beach both have Agricultural Departments, despite having less farmland. How can the city make informed decisions regarding agriculture and agricultural land if it doesn’t even have a department to track information and collect data? 

As part of the State of Agriculture presentation to the City Council, the Agricultural Advisory Committee recommended that the City of Suffolk establish an Agricultural Department. Mr. Bosselman stated the need and benefits of having this department:

  • It could bridge the gap between “growing” Suffolk and agricultural Suffolk
  • It could serve in conjunction with the Virginia Cooperative Extension in Suffolk
  • It could  oversee the implementation of the many public and private preservation and conservation programs available to farmers.
  • It could contribute to the formation of the agricultural aspects of the  Comprehensive Plan
  • It could manage the Suffolk Farmers Market with the goal of funding itself via this revenue (as is done in Virginia Beach)

Mr. Bossleman also discussed the loss of cropland in Suffolk. He stated there has been a loss of about 17% over the last 20 years. As Mr. Bosselman said in his parting words to City Council, “I find it quite ironic that we are here today, and I am trying to convince not only the city council, but all people, that are here to listen to me today, to preserve land that is growing food for us to eat, fiber for all of us to have clothes, and plants that clean carbon dioxide and impurities out of our air and provide oxygen for us to breathe.”

Mr. Bosselman should NOT have to plead the case for protecting agriculture in Suffolk. It is a major industry in the city and a way of life for many of its citizens. We all benefit from its continued existence in our city and everything our farmers produce. It is well past time for the City of Suffolk to create an Agricultural Department that can advocate for this essential industry and protect agriculture here for generations to come. 

 
]]>
https://care4suffolk.org/2024/01/26/the-state-of-agriculture-in-suffolk/feed/ 0
Legislative Agenda https://care4suffolk.org/2023/09/29/legislative-agenda/ https://care4suffolk.org/2023/09/29/legislative-agenda/#respond Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:36:17 +0000 https://care4suffolk.org/?p=2928 Read More »Legislative Agenda]]>

Next week at the October 4, 2023 City Council meeting, there will be a public hearing on a resolution for the City to adopt a 2024 Legislative Agenda. According to the resolution, adoption of the legislative agenda is “necessary as we prepare to meet with our state legislators prior to the start of the General Assembly Session, to discuss matters of importance to the City of Suffolk.” (The General Assembly convenes on January 10, 2024).

If you’re like me and are new to attending council meetings and engaging in the civic process, you may find this interesting. These slides are the draft agenda that was presented at the September 20, 2023 City Council meeting by Suffolk’s Legislative Liaisons from Access Point Public Affairs. The topics are: Public Safety, Community Development/Planning, Human Services, Transportation, Environmental/Utilities, Education and Workforce Development, and Finance/Regulation. 

There was nothing included pertaining to Agriculture, but Council Member Butler Barlow made three recommendations. Her first two recommendations are supported by Suffolk’s Agricultural Advisory Committee and pertain to agriculture preservation programs and Purchase of Development Rights as well as limiting use of Prime Farmlands for utility-scale solar. The third recommendation comes from Virginia Farm Bureau and is in support of Virginia’s Forest Sustainability Fund for Local Governments. 

Looking at the upcoming City Council meeting packet, it appears that the first and third of Council Member Butler Barlow’s requests are included in the “Utilities/Environmental” section. Hopefully, in the future, agriculture will not be an afterthought! Whether you agree or disagree with this agenda, it is apparent that there is a lot going on and many things to consider when prioritizing the city’s “legislative requests, policy positions, and funding requests.”

]]>
https://care4suffolk.org/2023/09/29/legislative-agenda/feed/ 0
Lake Kilby Rezoning Update https://care4suffolk.org/2023/01/31/lake-kilby-rezoning-update/ https://care4suffolk.org/2023/01/31/lake-kilby-rezoning-update/#respond Tue, 31 Jan 2023 02:10:50 +0000 https://care4suffolk.org/?p=1894 Read More »Lake Kilby Rezoning Update]]>

Lake Kilby rezoning request (RZN2021-00018) is set to be heard at the Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Planning Commission meeting at 2:00pm at City Hall. We will be mounting an opposition to this rezoning request. Please plan to attend to show your support for CARE4Suffolk and wear your blue CARE4Suffolk shirt (or any blue shirt).  If you would like to help in other ways, please email care4suffolk@gmail.com.

]]>
https://care4suffolk.org/2023/01/31/lake-kilby-rezoning-update/feed/ 0